The six standing questions put to any qualified human scholar who reads a sample. Answer any one in writing and it is published.
Is the choice of what to translate and cite representative, or does it lean?
Where commentaries agree, the agreement is stated; where they conflict, it is left aside, never adjudicated. Is that the right discipline?
Some editions speak rarely. Are they fairly represented?
Tanwir al-Miqbas' attribution is contested; is its use handled honestly?
Where two editions share a base, are links counted twice?
The readings were written by the same kind of model that reviewed them. What does a human find that the machine gates cannot?
AL-WAQF · the Scholar’s Desk · 2026-09-09.